Feb 082013

It is impossible not to notice the thick smogs that periodically blanket Krakow, or to wonder what they are doing to your lungs, but even on seemingly clear days the city’s air is among the most polluted in Europe with levels of contaminants frequently exceeding World Health Organisation safe limits.

Krakow is now firmly established as one of Europe’s top tourist destinations, attracting nine million visitors in 2012. Multinational companies are flocking here, as are young people unable to find jobs elsewhere in Europe. How long before awareness of the city’s poor air quality begins to make the city unattractive, threatening its economic health as well as the health of the people who live here?

According to the air-pollution activism group Krakowski Alarm Smogowy (Krakow Smog Alarm), the city has some of the poorest air quality in the world. They point to figures from the World Health Organisation that rank Krakow as eighth worst among 575 cities globally that record annual mean concentrations of PM2.5 in their air.

PM2.5 (particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns) and PM10 (smaller than 10 microns) are monitored because they have been shown to be a major cause of asthma, lung cancer, cardiovascular problems, respiratory diseases, birth defects and premature death. Krakow’s standing in the PM 10 rankings is an alarming 145 out of 1,100 cities where annual mean concentrations are recorded.

Placing these figures in perspective, it is important to note that many cities in the world that probably have worse air quality than Krakow’s do not officially record pollution levels. In other words: ‘where annual mean concentrations are recorded’ does not include what are probably the most polluted cities globally.

Despite this small consolation, Cracovians have become increasingly aware, and angry, about the quality of their air. Krakowski Alarm Smogowy was formed in December 2012, and has already gathered over 9,000 followers on Facebook. Describing itself as an: “apolitical, public initiative of Cracovians who want to live in the city and breathe air that is safe for their health and life,” the group has also created an online petition demanding action from the Małopolska Regional Assembly that now has more than 6,500 signatures.

How bad is it?

According to measurements taken by the Małopolska air monitoring network, the problem is very bad indeed. The network consists of 11 monitoring stations in the region, three of which are in Krakow (Al. Krasińskiego, ul. Bujaka, ul. Bulwarowa). Nine different pollutants are measured every day and their levels are reported on the network’s website (monitoring.krakow.pios.gov.pl/iseo/).

Krakowski Alarm Smogowy republishes these figures on its Facebook page, and points out some worrying trends: “In December 2012, residents of Kurdwanów could breathe safe air on only three days of the month, while in the city centre there was only one day with safe air.” On Monday January 28, for example, a day that was by no means atypical for winter in Krakow, PM10 levels recorded at all three stations in the city exceeded maximum safe levels (50 μg/m3) by between 380 and 500 percent.

Particulates are not the only problem. Levels of highly carcinogenic benzo[a]pyrene and nitrogen dioxide, which has been shown to inhibit lung function, are also high. Unsafe nitrogen dioxide levels are only recorded in three Polish cities: Warsaw, Wrocław and Krakow.

Why Krakow?

Two things work against Krakow’s air quality: pollution and geographical factors that prevent the dispersal of pollution. The two major sources of the most harmful pollutants are domestic solid fuel furnaces and motor vehicles, but local industry and air-borne pollutants from other parts of Poland and neighbouring countries also contribute.

Geographically, Krakow sits in a valley, which tends to concentrate pollutants, and experiences a low number of windy days, which means pollutants are not readily dispersed.

Clean air activists are focusing on the problem of domestic solid fuel furnaces as a major source of pollution, and one that could be eliminated relatively easily. Only about 10 percent of Krakow’s households use solid fuel furnaces for heating. Unfortunately, these furnaces are also frequently used to incinerate domestic waste, which is probably the leading cause of the most harmful pollutants. The problem becomes particularly visible during the winter heating season – always the period that sees the most extreme particulate and benzo[a]pyrene levels.


According to Krakowski Alarm Smogowy: “The fact that [10 percent of Cracovians] are not connected to the municipal heating network should be seen as a considerable defeat in Krakow’s development.” The organisation claims that: “A total ban on solid fuel burning in domestic furnaces constitutes the optimal solution, with the greatest ecological effect. It would allow for such a significant reduction in PM10s and benzo[a]pyrene that the problem of air pollution in Krakow would be solved.”

Bans of this kind have been successfully introduced elsewhere to tackle air pollution, most notably in the United Kingdom in 1956 (the Clean Air Act), and Ireland between 1990 and 2003. Outlawing the use of ‘smoky’ coal in Dublin in 1990 is believed to have resulted in 350 fewer deaths annually, and a 20m Euro saving in public health costs.

The obvious barrier to this solution is that it would deprive a significant number of Cracovians of their only source of domestic heating. Finding the money to provide these people with alternatives, or to offer subsidies to allow them to find their own alternatives, is a problem in a city that is already in a prolonged budget crisis.

Krakowski Alarm Smogowy recognises this problem but suggests that: “Local authorities should define a transition period (e.g. five years) and secure subsidies for the replacement of coal furnaces with sources that do not contribute to air pollution. Krakow should also develop a support programme for the poor in order to minimise the risk of fuel poverty.”

In a politically smart move, Krakow’s mayor, Jacek Majchrowski, has written a letter to the speaker of the Małopolska Regional Assembly calling for a ban on solid fuels. “Without radical decisions on solid fuels, we will not be able to meet the required air quality standards,” he stressed.

The problem of funding remains. Krakow has had a programme subsidising the replacement of solid fuel furnaces for many years, but it is proceeding at a glacial rate. Krakowski Alarm Smogowy note that, at the current rate of replacement, it could be decades before the last domestic furnaces are gone. One problem is that poorer Cracovians are unenthusiastic about getting rid of their coal-burning heaters, even with financial help, because it will simply result in higher fuel bills for their new heating system.

(Visited 7,009 times, 2 visits today)

  12 Responses to “Krakow’s Air Quality Among the Worst in the World”

  1. […] Krakow’s Air Quality Among the Worst in the World » Krakow Post. 51.491302 -0.114407 Share this:MoreLike this:LikeBe the first to like […]

  2. You reap what you sow.

    Stupid Cracovians can’t live without their cars. Just like most Poles.

    Yes heating is also a problem, but only during the winter period. Cars on the other hand are driving 365days/24hours. Just show me a cracovian professor, priest or local politician on a bike. Or look how many cars drive up and down the streets with big adverts http://www.krakowmiasto.pl/files/pict/2012-02-23/krakow-reklama-mobilna-przyczepy-reklamowe-przyczepa-reklamowa-z-naglosnieniem-5TczNjI3OT_o.jpg polluting the air.

    Pure stupidity and anarchy. May as many cracovoans die as soon as possible. Greetings from Charles Darvin…

    • Pole, don`t be silly. Exhaust fumes from cars is 20% of all Krakow pollution.

    • Many Poles burn their garbage; plastic bottles etc. in their home furnaces, you can smell this in the evenings, even in the villages. Polaks must be some of the dumbest people on earth, don’t they know that burning plastic is bad for your health … so asked my friend why they do this, she said it’s because they don’t want to pay the 10-15zl for garbage pick-up…but they can buy vodka every few days …Poland – one big village …

    • Pole: Well, aren’t you the enviromental-nazi of the week! Hitler would have been proud to call you his son.

  3. 3 years ago, krakow post was saying about air pollution that local government takes measures to reduce the problem http://www.krakowpost.com/article/1915
    3 years ago, Krakow was the 16th most polluted city in Europe. Today, Krakow is the 3rd most polluted city in Europe.
    Difficult to understand why nothing is done…Lack of money maybe, but I would rather say that it is more lack of political will.
    True that it is difficult to fight against the geographical situation, the lack of wind or the pollution from Silesia. But there is still place to fight against car traffic, domestic furnaces, local industry pollution and promote public transport (unlike with this f***ing new year rise of the price tickets, or the problem you can have finding a machine to buy a ticket with a card or the fun to buy a 5 zl ticket in the bus with the agressivity of the driver…), or bycicle transport…
    I always smile when I remember once I had just to finish a ride on a huge highway cause the bicycle path just stopped and I had no alternative. Most of the time I have to ride on the sidewalk even if I risk a fine. Yes, once I saw policeman giving a fine to a biker because he was cycling on the sidewalk just close to the future congres palace, where the bike path vanished since the construction started…
    I could continue with the jail risk you take by using a bike a bit drunk…
    Long way to do.

  4. Amazing to think how bad the air quality was under Russian/ commie rule 30 years ago when Nowa Huta was operating at full capacity. I recall as a young boy blowing my nose in to a tissue and the “snot” was always black. Having come back on many occasions to the city that my father decided to abandon some 30 years earlier I am always amazed that my “snot” is not black and that I have yet to pick up an eye infection. The air might not be clean now, but it would appear to me that it is a heck of a lot cleaner now than it used to be.

  5. […] largest tourist attractions, is reported as having very unsafe air quality, according to the Krakow Post.  Along with being a popular destination for those on vacation, it also ranks 8th out the 525 […]

  6. how will people visit krakow for 2016 world youth day…The government should take necessary steps to reduce the air pollution rate………

 Leave a Reply



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of delicious cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.