Krakow News 10 January 2017: UJ Senate rebukes government / Parents to plant trees in Krakow / Police raid UJ Hospital

Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum
Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum

Jagiellonian University Senate calls for restoration of “civilized debate” in Poland

52 members of the Senate of Krakow’s 653-year-old Jagiellonian University (with one abstention) voted to pass a resolution calling on the government to respect Poland’s democratic institutions. Drafted last month, it urges leaders to “restore to Poland civilized debate and faith in the value of the exchange of opinions,  freedom of speech is respected and rational arguments will prevail over the argument of force.” The move is seen as a rebuke of recent moves by the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party to limit the powers of the judiciary and press, which have also been widely condemned internationally. However, the Senate’s statement encouraged President Andrzej Duda to act as a mediator to “rebuild the national community.”


Krakow allows residents to plant trees for their children

The six areas where trees will be planted (via LoveKrakow)
The six areas where trees will be planted (via LoveKrakow)

The city of Krakow has designated six areas in the city totaling 35 hectares where residents will be able to plant a tree to commemorate the birth of a child. The move is designed for the many Cracovians who do not own land and thus are otherwise unable to follow this tradition. Anna Szybist, a city councilor who supported the idea, praised the move as “a grassroots initiative” which would furthermore teach children to appreciate nature.

Approximately 15,000 babies are born in Krakow annually. The areas can currently accommodate up to 7,000 trees, but Deputy Mayor for Development Elżbieta Koterba has said they may be expanded pending interest from the community. Details for how residents can participate will be announced in the following weeks.


Police raid UJ Hospital

Małopolskie authorities raided offices and employee homes in Krakow and Tarnów, seizing documents and data carriers. They suspect at least one employee of embezzling over 597,000 PLN worth of medical equipment, an offense punishable by up to 12 years in prison. More developments in the case are expected to follow.

[Gazeta Krakowska]

17 thoughts on “Krakow News 10 January 2017: UJ Senate rebukes government / Parents to plant trees in Krakow / Police raid UJ Hospital

  • January 14, 2017 at 2:54 am

    Academic Giants – 1
    Political Pygmies – 0

    • January 14, 2017 at 12:22 pm

      @ Salwator tram man – You and I generally seem to agree on things,but the ‘pygmy’ label might be slightly unfair. (A metaphorical use of course, but some would describe the term as sizeist). As always, beware of generalizing about people. On the other hand, the overall tone being set by the PiS leadership does seem to be unnecessarily confrontational. The opposition undoubtedly has its flaws, but there seems to be a marked lack of good will on the part of some individuals in the ruling party (no names mentioned,of course) and – to the outside observer – not much evidence of ‘civilized debate’, as the Krakow academics have pointed out.

      For some reason, the world’s media have taken it upon themselves to put Poland’s democracy under the microscope – more so, perhaps, than other countries in the region – and every sign of quarrelsomeness and infighting gets magnified out of all proportion.

      And if I seem to be lecturing you about your comment, then may I add that I am writing these line from sunny San Escobar.

      • January 14, 2017 at 3:12 pm

        The “overall tone”, as you put it, is set by the person at the top of any organisation, whether in business or politics. And in Poland at the moment, the man at the top of the political pyramid, even though he is only a humble parliamentarian, is a certain J. Kaczynski.

        • January 14, 2017 at 4:05 pm

          OK, Salwator. I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with you. since you are clearly more familiar with how things are in Poland than I am. Looking at it from the outside (San Escobar or wherever), Mr K seems to be increasingly bending everything to suit his own personal agenda. The fact that any opposition is in disarray seems to make him unassailable. But, judging by his occasional intemperate pronouncements (“parasites”, “worst sort of Poles”, etc) he isn’t doing all that well in the field of public relations.

          Speaking of personal agendas, I’ve been conducting a bit of a one-man campaign to defend the reputation of wartime leader General Wladyslaw Sikorski and I’ve been posting stuff all over the place, including an article in the 2nd December issue of the London ‘Tydzien Polski’ (only available in print so far).

          The charge made against the general is the unwarranted one of anti-Semitism. There were undoubtedly anti-Semites in the Polish army, but Sikorski wasn’t one of them. The accusation made against him deserves more than a written rebuttal, in my opinion. Since I’m sure that the Krakow Post is required reading in the top echelons of the Polish government, then maybe someone will agree with me in this case. The former Polish ambassador lodged an immediate protest but it didn’t seem to make any impression on the author. Therefore more action is needed. Not necessarily a court case, as I’ve said elsewhere, but an official demand for an apology might be appropriate.

          Here is just one of the articles on the subject:

          • January 15, 2017 at 3:18 am

            Kudos to your efforts, but I doubt if anyone in this government is remotely interested in the reputation of Sikorski.

          • January 15, 2017 at 12:01 pm

            Maybe. Maybe not. But – and I’ve made this point elsewhere – this could be something where the current government could actually gain itself a bit of sympathy instead of the usual criticism from foreign observers. Sikorski left no immediate family, as far as I know, to defend his reputation, He may not have been a saint – incarcerating army people who could have been useful in the front line simply because they were his political opponents is unforgivable – but the accusation that he did so because of his personal anti-Semitism is slanderous.

            I don’t actually expect much from this government, to tell you the truth, since they seem to have alienated a couple of independent and fair-minded historians already (the Gdansk museum business), but maybe there is a distant relation of Sikorski himself who might feel this is worth pursuing.

          • January 15, 2017 at 8:47 pm

            Unforgivable? I thought you were supposed to be defending Sikorski. But I agree that imprisoning people simply because they belonged to the Pilsudczycy or the Sanacja was a poor judgement call. But that’s the way of Polish politics, isn’t it? A party gets into power and a clean sweep is made of anyone considered “disloyal”.

            Anyway, I’m getting off the tram now, since I have to change for San Escobar.

          • January 16, 2017 at 12:28 am

            I believe the San Escobar joke has hit the buffers.

          • January 16, 2017 at 10:48 pm

            And now the “ordinary member of parliament” is announcing that he will reprimand the German chancellor. If I were the prime minister or the president, I’d resign in protest at this man’s presumption.

          • January 17, 2017 at 10:31 am

            Have you seen “Ucho Prezesa”? How can this be satirical if the Prezes likes it? His only objection, it seems, is that adult cats don’t drink milk (and that’s about the only thing where he and I agree).

          • January 17, 2017 at 10:52 am

            I caught one episode. It was rather good, I thought. But I can see why he wouldn’t object since it essentially makes fun of everyone except for him, which kind of defeats the object of the exercise.

          • January 17, 2017 at 11:00 am

            Here’s some satire by Marian Hemar aimed at Gomulka, which apparently made him furious.

            Towarzysz Tadeusz

            Dziwna wiadomość z kraju
            Bardzo mnie porusza –
            Podobno skonfiskowali
            “Pana Tadeusza”.

            Cenzor miał wątpliwości.
            Czytał, wahał się, chwiał się.
            Spocony jak mysz pod miotłą,
            Otwarcie mówiąc – bał się.

            Wy się jemu nie dziwcie,
            Nie śmiejcie się, mili moi,
            Z biednego urzędnika,
            Że on się – trudno – boi.

            Niech was to nie oburza,
            Nie miejcie go za tchórza,
            U niego pensja mała,
            Odpowiedzialność duża.

            Puści co nieopatrznie,
            Z posady go wyleją.
            Nie puści, skonfiskuje,
            Wszyscy się z niego śmieją.

            Czytał. Bał się. Miał różne
            Skrupuły i skrupułki.
            Nareszcie poszedł z tekstem
            Do towarzysza Gomułki.

            Gomułka bierze książkę
            Do ręki. Okładkę czyta.
            Głową kręci. Brwi marszczy.
            “Co to takiego? – pyta.

            “Pan Tadeusz”? Sam tytuł
            Mnie razi od pierwszej chwili.
            Nie trzeba żadnych panów.
            Panowie się skończyli.

            Wy – mówi do cenzora –
            Ideowy słabeusz.
            Zmieńcie zara ten tytuł
            Na “Towarzysz Tadeusz”.

            A kto – pyta – wymyślił
            Tytuł takiego chowu?”
            “Mickiewicz” – powiada cenzor.
            “Co? – rzekł Gomułka – On? Znowu?

            Ja zaczynam – powiada
            Z chmurą groźnego oblicza –
            Mieć już po uszy tego
            Waszego Mickiewicza.

            “Litwo, ojczyzno moja”.
            Jakie to ma znaczenie?
            Że on z paszportu Litwin?”
            “Nie – odrzekł cenzor – nie, nie,

            To inwokacja… w rodzaju
            Poetyckiej modlitwy” –
            “Nie może pójść – rzekł Gomułka.
            Ręce precz – rzekł – od Litwy.

            “Litwo, ojczyzna moja,
            Ty jesteś jak zdrowie –
            Ile cię trzeba cenić
            Ten tylko się dowie,

            Kto cię stracił” – nie może
            Pójść. Nasza sąsiedzka

            Litwa nie jest stracona,
            Przeciwnie, odkąd radziecka,

            Zyskana dla demokracji!
            “Dziś cię w całej ozdobie
            Widzę i opisuję.
            Bo tęsknię po tobie”.

            Widzi i opisuje?
            Fotografuje może?
            I za granicą wydaje?
            Towarzyszu cenzorze,

            Sprawdźcie, czy jest u niego
            Piśmienne zezwolenie
            Na swobodne zwiedzanie
            Po radzieckim terenie

            I na opisywanie…
            Bo samo się nasuwa,
            Że wywiad zagraniczny
            Nie śpi… szpieg czyha, wróg czuwa…

            “Panno święta, co Jasnej
            Bronisz Częstochowy” –
            A wot. I wiadomo, z czyjej
            To pisane namowy!

            “I w Ostrej świecisz bramie” –
            W Wilnie, co? Tuś mi, bratku.
            Skreślić! Tego nie można
            Puścić! W żadnym wypadku!

            Nie możem się narazić
            Na ostrą radziecką notę,
            Że my propagujemy
            Dywersyjną robotę

            I próby jakiejś ponownej
            Grabieży czy aneks j i!
            Kosygin, jakby to czytał,
            Dostałby apopleksji!

            “Jak mnie, dziecko, do zdrowia
            Przywróciłaś cudem” –
            Nie może pójść! W medycynie
            Nie ma cudów! My z trudem

            Wyjaśniamy ludowi,
            By się wyzwolił ze szponów
            Kleru i z religijnych
            Bajek i zabobonów,

            A on nam psuje robotę
            I tyle robi krzyku,
            Że jemu gorączka spadła
            Po proszku czy po zastrzyku –

            “I zaraz mogłem pieszo
            Do twych świątyń progu
            Iść, za wrócone życie
            Podziękować Bogu –

            Tak nas powrócisz cudem
            Na ojczyzny łono” –
            Nie może pójść!!! Tę całą
            Propagandę skrzywioną

            Skonfiskować! To przecież
            Wewnętrzne emigranctwo!
            Mocarstwowe zakusy!
            Wyraźne religianctwo!”

            Tak on krzyczał, nogami
            Tupał, zębami zgrzytał
            I oczy wybałuszał
            I pięścią bił w stół – aż przeczytał:

            “I z dziecinną radością
            Pociągnął za sznurek,
            By stary Dąbrowskiego
            Usłyszeć mazurek” –

            Wszystko skreślić! Poprawić!
            Przepisać słowo w słowo!
            Sam wam podsunę – powiedział –
            Jak to zmienić na nowo:

            “Rosjo, ojczyzno nasza!
            Ty jesteś jak życie!
            Ile cię trzeba cenić,
            Tera wszyscy widzicie!

            Dziś twą przyjaźń i dobroć
            Widzę w całej ozdobie,
            Bo ty z nami jak matka,
            My jak dziatki przy tobie!

            Włodzimierzu Iliczu
            Co czuwasz w szklanej trumnie,
            Jak kiedyś, gdy byłem dzieckiem,
            Swe oczy zwróciłeś ku mnie

            I dialektykę Marxa
            W dziecięce wpoiłeś grono,
            Tak nas przygarniasz na naszej
            Radzieckiej ojczyzny łono!

            I z dziecinną radością
            Pociągnął za stryczek,
            Ażeby popularnych
            Posłuchać muzyczek”.

            Tak mi ma zostać! l wtedy
            Nikomu to nie zawadzi.
            Z grubsza podsuwam – i niech to
            Iwaszkiewicz wygładzi.

            A Mickiewicza, autora
            Tych wrogich nam poematów,
            Wykluczamy pośmiertnie
            Ze Związku literatów!!!”

            [Taka przyszła wiadomość…
            Wciąż mi chodzi po głowie:
            Czy to prima aprilis?
            Czy prawda?… kto mi powie?]

          • January 17, 2017 at 12:06 pm

            Hemar was a brilliant satirist and very daring in his time. But I think we’re straying miles away from the above article and not everyone reading this speaks Polish. Signing out for now. Cheers.

            PS I wonder if Poland is ready for a “Spitting Image” type of satire which spared absolutely nobody?

          • January 17, 2017 at 2:29 pm

            Mr. Karski, maybe you didn’t understand all the Polish dialogue, but I’d recommend watching all episodes of “Ucho Prezesa”. If Mr. Kaczynski imagines this is a flattering portrait of him, then the satirists have done their job very well.

          • January 17, 2017 at 6:23 pm

            Last reply to vegetarian cyclist (not wishing to be rude).

            I took your advice and watched them all. I think I see what you mean. The “prezes” character (guess who?) comes across as quite witty – even likeable. I guess the satire consists of the fact that everyone else fawns and creeps. And if I missed any fine points of language, then the version I saw had English subtitles.

            Now I’m definitely disappearing, (need to invest in a haggis for Burns Night)…

  • February 2, 2017 at 8:19 pm

    All the good ones were taken out in Sondeaktion Krakau. All that’s left are the dregs.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *